Pistol permits and permits to carry firearms are unconstitutional. 

No other constitutional right requires you to get government permission prior to exercising it. States still insist on making you get their permission though before exercising your Second Amendment rights. That is blatantly unconstitutional. 

Lawyers have pulled punches in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. No one has attacked state pistol permit regimes as unconstitutional, except for Attorney Cameron Atkinson.

Attorney Atkinson challenged the constitutionality of Connecticut's pistol permits in Severino v. Spagnola and again in State v. Geraldo Alvarez. In both cases, the state of Connecticut moved heaven and earth to prevent the courts from deciding those issues. Like most tyrants, they know that the days of their tyranny are numbered now. 

The only way that governments can justify pistol permits is by comparing them to restrictions on slaves and Indians owning firearms. We dare anti-gun governments to resort to racism to defend their pistol permitting laws. 

Attorney Atkinson is now looking to force the constitutionality of pistol permits to the United States Supreme Court. To that end, he will file challenges to pistol permits' constitutionality across the United States to create what is called a circuit split - a compelling reason for the Supreme Court to accept a case. 

Litigation of that nature is expensive and time-consuming. Attorney Atkinson needs your help to wage this fight and stop the government from requiring you to get its permission to have a gun. Please donate $5 or $10 to help us file an avalanche of these lawsuits across the United States. 

About Attorney Atkinson:

Attorney Atkinson owns his own law firm based out of Bridgeport, Connecticut. He has filed, and is litigating, numerous Second Amendment cases across the United States. Here's a sample:

• Grant v. Rovella (challenge to CT's assault weapons ban) - currently pending at the Second Circuit.
• Nastri v.  (challenge to CT's ban on carrying in state parks) - currently pending after Attorney Atkinson secured a victory at the Second Circuit reviving the case.
• Nastri v. Garland (nationwide challenge to the federal ban on carrying in post offices) - currently pending in Connecticut federal court.
• Succow v. Bondi (challenge to federal and state bans prohibiting 18-20-year-olds from purchasing/carrying handguns) - currently pending in Connecticut federal court. 
• We The Patriots USA, Inc v. Grisham (challenge to New Mexico governor's order banning the carrying of firearms in two New Mexico counties) - Attorney Atkinson secured a victory that halted enforcement of the governor's order. The case remains pending for damages. 
• Severino v. Spagnola (challenge to Connecticut's pistol permit regime) - case dismissed as moot after Connecticut surrendered and gave plaintiff his pistol permit. 
• State v. Geraldo Alvarez (challenge to Connecticut's pistol permit regime) - case resolved after Connecticut dropped all of the gun charges.
• State v. Michael Giannone (challenge to Connecticut's assault weapons ban and its ban on suppressors) - case pending a motion to dismiss. 

https://atkinsonlawfirm.com/